100% renewable energy in a country is typically a more challenging goal than
carbon neutrality. The latter is a
climate mitigation target, politically decided by many countries, and may also be achieved by balancing the total
carbon footprint of the country (not only emissions from energy and fuel) with carbon dioxide removal and
carbon projects abroad.
In 2014, renewable sources such as
wind,
geothermal,
solar,
biomass, and burnt waste provided 19% of the total energy consumed worldwide, with roughly half of that coming from traditional use of biomass.
[8] The most important
[clarification needed] sector is electricity with a renewable share of 22.8%, most of it coming from hydropower with a share of 16.6%, followed by wind with 3.1%.
[8] As of 2018 according to
REN21 transformation is picking up speed in the power sector, but urgent action is required in heating, cooling and transport.
[9] There are many places around the world with grids that are run almost exclusively on renewable energy. At the national level, at least 30 nations already have renewable energy contributing more than 20% of the energy supply.
[citation needed]
According to a review of the 181
peer-reviewed papers on 100% renewable energy which were published until 2018, "[t]he great majority of all publications highlights the technical feasibility and economic viability of 100% RE systems." While there are still many publications which focus on electricity only, there is a growing number of papers that cover different energy sectors and
sector-coupled, integrated energy systems. This cross-sectoral, holistic approach is seen as an important feature of 100% renewable energy systems and is based on the assumption "that the best solutions can be found only if one focuses on the synergies between the sectors" of the energy system such as electricity, heat, transport or industry.
[10]
Professors S. Pacala and
Robert H. Socolow of Princeton University have developed a series of "
climate stabilization wedges" that can allow us to maintain our quality of life while avoiding catastrophic
climate change, and "renewable energy sources," in aggregate, constitute the largest number of their "wedges."
[11]
Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering at
Stanford University and director of its Atmosphere and Energy program, says that producing all new energy with
wind power,
solar power, and
hydropower by 2030 is feasible, and that existing energy supply arrangements could be replaced by 2050. Barriers to implementing the renewable energy plan are seen to be "primarily social and political, not technological or economic". Jacobson says that
energy costs today with a wind, solar, and water system should be similar to today's energy costs from other optimally cost-effective strategies.
[12] The main obstacle against this scenario is the lack of political will.
[13] His conclusions have been disputed by other researchers.
[14] Jacobson published a response that disputed the piece point by point
[15] and claimed that the authors were motivated by allegiance to energy technologies that the 2015 paper excluded.
[14]
Similarly, in the United States, the independent
National Research Council has noted that "sufficient domestic renewable resources exist to allow renewable electricity to play a significant role in future electricity generation and thus help confront issues related to climate change,
energy security, and the escalation of energy costs ... Renewable energy is an attractive option because renewable resources available in the United States, taken collectively, can supply significantly greater amounts of electricity than the total current or projected domestic demand."
[16]